pi kappa alpha risk awareness handbook for the new paradigm society

Pi Kappa Alpha Risk Awareness Handbook For The New Paradigm Society Free Public Full

As will be argued in more detail below, we posit that felt lure refers to an affective process, instead of a cognitive one, and that modelling it simply as a benefit in terms of a conventional rational-choice framework fails to accurately depict how the actual decision process unfolds.

We distinguished between peoples task-related conscience, as embodied by the Conscientiousness personality trait, and a more general moral conscience as embodied by the Honesty-Humility trait, hypothesizing that both traits are differentially related to the way situational characteristics, such as costs and benefits, are perceived.

We operationalized the concept of felt lure emanating from the benefits of a crime, defining it as an affective state that tempts people to commit a criminal act, and examined it next to perceived risk of sanction as a proximate predictor of criminal choice.

In line with our predictions, Conscientiousness and Honesty-Humility significantly predicted occupational criminal choice as did felt lure and perceived risk.

Specifically, perceived risk and felt lure mediated the relations between Conscientiousness and Honesty-Humility on the one hand, and occupational criminal choice on the other..

Unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients and significance levels for Model in Figure 2 (N590) Figures - uploaded by Jean-Louis Van Gelder Author content All figure content in this area was uploaded by Jean-Louis Van Gelder Content may be subject to copyright.

Pi Kappa Alpha Risk Awareness Handbook For The New Paradigm Society Free Public Full

Discover the worlds research 20 million members 135 million publications 700k research projects Join for free Public Full-text 1 Content uploaded by Jean-Louis Van Gelder Author content All content in this area was uploaded by Jean-Louis Van Gelder on Jan 17, 2019 Content may be subject to copyright.

We d istinguished between peoples task -related conscience, as embodied by the Conscientiousness personality trait, and a more general moral conscience as embodied by the Honesty-Humility trait, hypothesizing that both traits are differentially related to the way situational characteristics, such as costs and benefits, are perceived.

Specifically, perceived risk and felt lure mediated the relations between Conscientiousness and Honesty-Humility on the one hand, and occupational criminal choice on the other.

Keywords: personality, rational choice, affect, dual-process models, white-collar crime.

The Global Economic Crime Survey indicates that more than a third of the organizations from 95 participating countries reported some form of economic crime, such as fraud, bribery, corruption, or asset misappropriation by employees, the latter being the most common type of economic crime by far (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2014; see also Bussmann Werle, 2006).

According to recent estimates, asset misappropriation schemes (e.g., theft of company cash, false billing schemes, inflated expense reports) comprise more than 80 of all fraud cases in the U.S.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2012).

In fact, employees may steal more from most businesses on average than do shoplifters, burglars, or robbers (Friedrichs, 2009, p.

McCaghy and Capron (1994) even argue that it seems safe to assume that employee theft is one of the most costly, if not the most costly, offense by individuals in the United States (p.

In spite of the fact that theft and fraud by employees are ubiquitous and costly, occupational crime by ordinary employees is a field of study that so far hasnt been able to generate much enthusiasm among crime researchers.

As Wright and Cullen (2000, p.

In the words of Benson and Moore (1992, p.

Important exceptions aside (e.g., Benson Moore, 1992; Hirschi Gottfredson, 1987.

Furthermore, while the trait-state perspective coincides with the view that the presence of criminal opportunity is important for crime to take place, it argues that the opportunity itself does not dictate that all who perceive it, also seize it.

That is, people must somehow be tempted or lured by it, and some will yield to temptation more easily than others.

Analogously, some individuals are more likely to be deterred by the risky prospect of a sanction following their misbehaviour than others.

As Shover and Hochstetler (2005, p.

Lure does not evoke a uniform response either from individuals or organizations.

Many remain blithely unaware of it they simply do not see what is apparent to others- and most who do take notice of lure react with seeming indifference.

Some who chance upon and take notice of lure turn their attention immediately to whether or not there is credible oversight.

Lure makes the tempted and criminally predisposed sensitive to whether or not their actions are being monitored and how oversight might be defeated.

In this article, we follow up on this intuition by operationalizing lure and by relating it to peoples personality.